In the relentless pursuit of productivity and profit, organisations often overlook one fundamental aspect: the health of the brain and body of their staff. This, however, is a grave oversight, as the physical and mental well-being of employees is intrinsically tied to their performance and, consequently, the overall success of an organisation. The workplace environment plays a crucial role in fostering this well-being.

Imagine walking into a workspace designed not just for the tasks you need to accomplish, but also for your well-being. The lighting is just right, the air is fresh, the furniture is ergonomically designed, and there are spaces for relaxation and social interaction. This is not a fantasy, but a possibility grounded in evidence-based research.

Research suggests that the physical environment can significantly impact an individual’s cognitive function and emotional state. This includes the layout of the workspace, the quality of light, noise levels, and even the presence of plants.

For instance, a study by Klatte, Bergström, and Lachmann (2013) found that noise in the workplace can significantly impact cognitive performance. They found that irrelevant speech and background noise led to decreased performance in tasks requiring memory and attention. This suggests that designing quieter workspaces or providing noise-cancelling options could enhance cognitive performance.

Likewise, light quality is a critical factor. Poor lighting can cause eyestrain, headaches, fatigue, and stress, all of which can impact productivity. On the other hand, exposure to natural light has been shown to enhance mood, energy, alertness, and productivity.

The layout of the workspace is another vital aspect. Open-plan offices, while promoting communication and collaboration, can also lead to distractions and stress. Thus, a balance must be struck, perhaps by providing a mix of open spaces for collaboration and private spaces for focused work.

Even the presence of plants in the workplace can have a positive impact. A study by Raanaas, Evensen, Rich, Sjøstrøm, & Patil (2011) found that indoor plants can reduce fatigue, stress, and promote overall well-being.

While the physical environment is crucial, it’s also essential to consider the social environment. This includes the quality of relationships, opportunities for development, and the overall culture of the organisation. A positive social environment can foster a sense of belonging, motivation, and job satisfaction, which can significantly impact productivity.

For instance, supportive relationships at work can act as a buffer against stress and burnout. Similarly, opportunities for learning and development can enhance motivation and engagement. Furthermore, a culture that values well-being and work-life balance can promote overall health and productivity.

The design of workspaces, therefore, must consider not just the physical, but also the social aspects. A holistic approach to design, taking into account the brain and body health of employees, can result in a win-win situation: healthier, happier employees and a more successful organisation.

In conclusion, the importance of designing workplaces for brain and body health cannot be overstated. It’s not just about aesthetics or trends, but about creating an environment that fosters the well-being and productivity of employees. A well-designed workspace can be a powerful tool in promoting health, happiness, and productivity. So, the next time you walk into your workspace, ask yourself: is this space designed for my well-being?

References:

– Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.
– Bergland, C. (2015). The Athlete’s Way: Sweat and the Biology of Bliss. St. Martin’s Press.
– Boubekri, M., Cheung, I. N., Reid, K. J., Wang, C. H., & Zee, P. C. (2014). Impact of windows and daylight exposure on overall health and sleep quality of office workers: a case-control pilot study. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 10(6), 603–611.
– Boyce, P. R., Hunter, C., & Howlett, O. (2003). The benefits of daylight through windows. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
– Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.
– Halbesleben, J. R. (2006). Sources of social support and burnout: a meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1134–1145.
– Haar, J. M., Russo, M., Suñe, A., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2014). Outcomes of work–life balance on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and mental health: a study across seven cultures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 361–373.
– Kim, J., & de Dear, R. (2013). Workspace satisfaction: The privacy-communication trade-off in open-plan offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 18–26.
– Klatte, M., Bergström, K., & Lachmann, T. (2013). Does noise affect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 578.
– Raanaas, R. K., Evensen, K. H., Rich, D., Sjøstrøm, G., & Patil, G. (2011). Benefits of indoor plants on attention capacity in an office setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(1), 99–105.